
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
Dec 5, 2023 · Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (plaintiff) sought to sublease their space at One New York Plaza to Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. (defendant). The lease required written consent from their landlord by a specific date, which was not met by …
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
Get Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 86 N.Y.2d 685 (1995), Court of Appeals of New York, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 660 …
Nov 30, 1995 · In 1986, plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. moved to the World Financial Center in Manhattan, a building constructed by Olympia & York Company (O & Y). At the time of its move, plaintiff had three years remaining on its existing lease for the 33rd floor of the building known as One New York Plaza.
Oppenheimer Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon - Casetext
Jun 23, 1994 · Read Oppenheimer Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon, 205 A.D.2d 412, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Apel, Dixon & Co
The Plaintiff, Oppenheimer & Co. (Plaintiff), entered into a sublease agreement with the Defendant, Oppenheim, Apel, Dixon & Co (Defendant). The agreement contained a provision stating “there would be no sublease between the parties unless and until plaintiff delivered to defendant the prime landlord’s written consent to certain tenant work.”
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. (1995
The case is about a letter agreement for a sublease that included obtaining the prime landlord's consent to tenant work by a specified date. The plaintiff failed to meet this condition, and the...
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
Nov 30, 1995 · On February 26, defendant, through its attorney, informed plaintiff's attorney that the letter agreement and sublease were invalid for failure to timely deliver the prime landlord's written consent and that it would not agree to an extension of the deadline.
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
Nov 30, 1995 · Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Respondent, v Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., Appellant. The parties entered into a letter agreement setting forth certain conditions precedent to the formation and existence of a sublease between them.
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. Case …
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. Case Brief Summary: A company tried to sublease a space from another company, but failed to get written consent from the prime landlord by a certain deadline.
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. | Legal …
In 1986, plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. moved to the World Financial Center in Manhattan, a building constructed by Olympia & York Company (O & Y). At the time of its move, plaintiff had …
- Some results have been removed