Additional Commissioner [W.P. No. 4211 OF 2024 dated February 23, 2024], the Madras High Court addressed the validity of a show-cause notice (SCN) and subsequent order issued against the petitioner.

The adjudicating officer emphasized that the penalty was proportionate to the non-compliance, with the maximum allowable ...

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH, CORPORATE ...

The Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh, issued an adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, ...

The violation pertained to the company’s failure to include its web address in the directors’ reports for the financial years ending on March 31, 2018, and March 31, 2019, as required by the Act.

11. Attention is also invited to section 454 (8) of the Companies Act, 2013, in the event of non­compliance of this order. In ...

The adjudicating officer determined that each director, along with the company, was liable for a penalty of ₹1,00,000, ...

Wife Filing False Case Against Husband, In-Laws To Correct His Behaviour Is Cruelty, Not Acceptable In Marital Relations: Bombay HC ...

His funda is simple – by working more, one can achieve their target in four months, which otherwise would take a year.” But if “we work like hell”, we will go to hell only. L&T Chairman S N ...

9. The Noticee shall pay the amount of penalty by way of Demand Draft in favour of “Pay & Accounts Officer, Ministry of ...

3. During the course of Inquiry, the following non-compliances were observed from the Minutes Books of the proceedings of the ...

9. The Noticee shall pay the amount of penalty by way of e-payment [available on Ministry website mca.gov.in] under “Pay ...