The Trump administration has capped indirect costs for National Institutes of Health research grants at 15%. That would wipe ...

Scientists and medical researchers being let go by President Donald Trump’s administration walked out of the gates of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, Friday afternoon ...

Potential delays in clinical trials may result in extended timelines for new drug approvals, and a sudden reduction in ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

The state's life sciences industry, which generated $3.3 billion in economic activity in 2023, could be severely impacted by ...

This is seismic,” said Dr. Colin Duckett, vice dean for basic and preclinical science at the Duke University School of ...

The National Institutes of Health proposal would limit indirect costs for research projects to 15 percent of grants.

With funding from the NIH earmarked by the Autism CARES Act, researchers aim to pinpoint the environmental factors that ...

Cuts to administrative costs associated with NIH grants could jeopardize the economic well-being of cities dependent on ...

Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...

More than half a billion dollars are at stake for Massachusetts universities, hospitals, and research institutions if federal ...

University of Colorado Regent Wanda James said the NIH funding cuts impact hundreds of research employees at the University ...